M.U.ISAAC
Ammukutty Amma Ponnamma – Appellant
Versus
Narayana Panikkar Neelakantan Nair – Respondent
This is a petition to revise the order of the Munsif-Magistrate, Ettumanoor dismissing an application which the petitioner made under Section 488 Cr. P. C. for getting maintenance from the respondent.
2. The respondent married the petitioner in April 1948, while he was in Military service. The petitioner's case is that, while this marriage remains in force, the respondent married another lady by a registration in December 1951, and thereafter he neglected to maintain the petitioner. She complained to the Military authorities as a result of which he began to send her some money. Subsequently, he was discharged from the Military, and he had not been giving her any maintenance during the past one year.
On these and other allegations which are not necessary to be stated here, she claimed a monthly maintenance of Rs. 60/- from the respondent. The respondent, while admitting the marriage, contended that the petitioner left his house contrary to his instructions soon after the marriage, and began to live an immoral life in her own house. In April 1949, when he came on leave, he went to the petitioner's house to take her home, but he was turned out by the petitioner and her relations
(1966) AIR 1966 Cal 83 (V 53) : 1966 Cri LJ 143. Rupchand v. Charubala
(1965) AIR 1965 Cal 190 (V 52) : 1965 (1) Cri LJ 425
(1963) AIR 1963 Mad 263 (V 50) : 1963 (2) Cri LJ 166
(1959) AIR 1959 All 767 (V 46) : 1959 Cri LJ 1386
(1956) AIR 1956 Cal 134 (V 43) : 1956 Cri LJ 526
(1966) AIR 1966 Bom 48 (V 53) : 1966 Cri LJ 131
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.