T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Ramakrishna Pillai, J.
1. The accused, who were tried, found guilty, convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three years by the Additional District and Sessions Court (Fast Track-I), Thiruvananthapuram, for offences punishable under Section 376 IPC on a charge sheet laid by the Circle Inspector of Police, Kilimanoor, in Crime No.166 of 2003 of the Kilimanoor Police Station, are in appeal before us. The allegation was that they committed rape on the prosecutrix, a minor, on different occasions during the first half of the year 2003.
2. The appellant in Crl.A.No.2661 of 2008 is the first accused, who is none other than the father of the victim. He has preferred the appeal from the Central Prison, Thiruvananthapuram, where he is undergoing imprisonment. Crl.A.No.2629 of 2008 is filed by the second accused, who is the first cousin of the victim. For convenience of discussion they can be referred to as they are arrayed in the impugned judgment.
3. The first accused is defended by a counsel engaged at the expense of the State and the second accused is def
2. Sri.Narayan Saha and another v. State of Tripura [AIR 2005 SC 1452]
4. Shri Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Miss Subhra Chakraborty [AIR 1996 SC 922])
1. Aman Kumar v. State of Haryana [AIR 2004 SC 1497]
3. Gurcharan Singh v. State of Haryana [AIR 1972 SC 2661]
5. State of U.P. v. Krishna Gopal and Another [AIR 1988 SC 2154].
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.