T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
George – Appellant
Versus
T. K. Saidu Muhammed – Respondent
Ramachandran Nair, J.
1. Fixation of fair rent on an application for the same by the landlord by invoking Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act (for short `the Act’) has led to the respective revision petitions filed by the tenant as well as by the landlord. R.C.R.No.182/2012 is filed by the landlord and R.C.R.No.354/2012 is filed by the tenant.
2. During arguments, the issue boiled down to one point, viz, the date from which the fixation of fair rent can be made applicable by the Rent Control Court.
3. The above arguments has come to light in the revision petition filed by the landlord, since the grant of benefit of fixation from the date of filing of the petition, viz. 15.12.2004 has been modified by the Appellate Authority, to be effective from 6.11.2010, i.e. the date of the order passed by the Rent Control Court. The question is whether the same is a permissive mode.
4. In the revision petition filed by the tenant, various grounds have been stated including the challenge against the amount fixed.
5. The tenancy started in the year 1989, exactly on 3.2.1989 on a monthly rent of Rs.800/- for the building bearing door No.15/543 of Vadakkancherry
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.