S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
Kallangadi Edathil Chathan Veettil Kumaran Kidavu – Appellant
Versus
Niduvanchalil Keloth Damodaran Nair – Respondent
1. Additional defendants 11 and 12 in a Suit for Partition are the appellants. Respondents are plaintiff and defendants 2 to 10 in the suit.
2. First respondent/plaintiff is the brother of late Krishnan Nair, who predeceased his mother, namely, Mathu Amma. Nine items of properties are included in the suit for partition. Over item No. 1 Krishnan Nair, his mother, plaintiff and another brother (Raman Nair), all of them together, obtained rights by assignment, and, later one of the brothers, Raman Nair, released his right in favour of Krishnan Nair. Krishnan Nair married Lakshmi Amma, and on his death issueless his rights in item no.1 devolved equally on his mother and Lekshmi Amma. Over the rest, item nos.2 to 9, all of which belonged to Krishnan Nair, his widow and his mother got equal rights by inheritance. On the death of Mathu Amma, mother, her 1/2 right inherited over the properties of Krishnan Nair devolved upon her legal heirs, her children, plaintiffs and defendants 2 to 4, and also the children of another son Raman Nair, who predeceased his mother, defendants 5 to 7 in the suit. Pending the suit first defendant passed away, and her legal heirs were impleaded as Def
Savithri and Others versus Karthyayani Amma and Others (AIR 2008 SC 300)
S.R.Srinivasa and others versus S. Padmavathamma (2010) 5 SCC 274)
K.Laxmanan versus Thekkayil Padmini and others (2009) 1 SCC 354)
Ajay P. Asher versus Kirit P.Asher and another (2011 (3) KHC 288)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.