1. The defendants in O.S.11/1992 on the file of Subordinate Judge's Court, Sulthanbathery are the appellants. Suit of the respondents for declaration of title, recovery of possession and injunction was decreed by learned Sub Judge, and hence the appeal.

2. Respondents in the appeal, who are the legal heirs of plaintiff, and, impleaded in the suit as additional plaintiffs 2 to 6, have filed Cross objections to the extent aggrieved by the nongranting of mesne profits claimed,and also against some of the findings made by the learned Sub Judge.

3. Appellants are hereinafter referred to as defendants, and respondents, as plaintiffs.

4. Suit was instituted before the Munsiff Court, Mananthavady, scheduling two items in the plaint, A and B schedule, seeking recovery of A schedule, a building situate in B schedule property, from defendants 1 to 4, for a decree of injunction against them from trespassing upon plaint B schedule property excluding the building, and from committing acts of waste and taking income therefrom. Suit claims were resisted by defendants setting up a rival claim of title and possession over the entire property including the building. Plaint was later amended fo