T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, P.V.ASHA
Sreedevi Antherjanam – Appellant
Versus
Bhavadasan Namboodiri – Respondent
Ramachandran Nair, J.
1. A suit for partition in which the appellants were arrayed as defendants, was decreed by the court below in favour of the plaintiff. It was found that the plaintiff/respondent is entitled to get 6/10 shares in the plaint schedule properties and that the appellants are entitled to get 4/10 shares together. By holding so, a preliminary decree has been passed which is under challenge in this appeal. The first appellant, the mother of appellants 2 to 4 died during the pendency of the appeal and appellants 2 to 4 have been recorded as legal representatives of the deceased first appellant.
2. The parties are Nambudiries. The respondent/plaintiffs father late Shri Neelakantan Nambudiri had the plaintiff as his son through the first wife. The mother of the plaintiff died before 1955. Appellant NO.1 is the second wife of deceased Neelakantan Nambudiri and appellants 2, 3 and 4 are his children through the first appellant.
3. Late Shri Neelakantan Nambudiri belonged to a Nambudiri Mana known as Thekkiniyedath Mana. The properties of the Mana were partitioned by a registered partition deed dated 27.6.1958, No.1062/1958 of the Sub Registry Office, Ottappallam. The
P. Krishnan Embrandiri v. P. Kesavan Embrandiri (1958 KLT 315)
Govind Potti Govindan Nambudiri v. Kesavan Govindan Poti and others (AIR 1987 SC 2276)
Kalyani v. Narayanan (AIR 1980 SC 1173)
Man Singh (dead) by Lrs v. Ram Kala (dead) by Lrs. and others {(2010) 14 SCC 350}
Krishnabai Ganpatrao v. Appasaheb Tuljaramarao (1979) 4 SCC 60 at p. 68: (AIR 1979 SC 1880)
Raghavamma v. A. Chenchamma (AIR 1964 SC 136)
Savithri Devaki Antharjanam v. Krishnaru & others (1972 KLT 532)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.