SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ker) 373

V.K.MOHANAN, A.HARIPRASAD
Sindhu K. Rajan – Appellant
Versus
M. Ajith – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Kaleeswaram Raj, Advocate.

Judgment :

A. Hariprasad, J.

1. Original Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

"i) To issue a directing (sic) the learned Judge of the Family Court, Thrissur to dispose of O.PNo.708/2014 expeditiously by waiving the 6 months period and by the next hearing date;

ii) To issue such other orders, direction (sic) may be prayed for and that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit on the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. Kernel of the facts:

Petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Admittedly they are Hindus governed by the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short, "the Act"). Their marriage was solemnized on 10.07.2009.

3. Nuptial euphoria did not last long. Gradually their relationship ran into rough weather. Ultimately they realised that it was impossible to live together as man and wife. There was an earlier round of litigation between the parties as the wife approached this Court with O.P.(FC) No.59 of 2014. In that proceedings, this Court directed the parties to try a chance at mediation to settle the differences. Pursuant to that direction, the parties approached the Kerala Mediation Centre. It is to be noted that other liti






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top