Y. K. SABHARWAL, P. P. NAOLEKAR
JIMMY SUDARSHAN PUROHIT – Appellant
Versus
SUDARSHAN SHARAD PUROHIT – Respondent
ORDER
1. THIS TRANSFER PETITION HAS BEEN FILED BY THE WIFE AGAINST THE RESPONDENT HUSBAND SEEKING TRANSFER OF PA NO. 334 OF 2003, ENTITLED SUDARSHAN SHARAD PUROHIT V. JIMMY SUDARSHAN PUROHIT PENDING IN THE FAMILY COURT NO.1 AT PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, TO APPROPRIATE COURT AT JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN. PRIMA FACIE, FINDING THAT THE FAMILY DISPUTE CAN BE SETTLED, WE REQUESTED MR S. MURALIDHAR, ADVOCATE, TO ASSIST THE PARTIES AS MEDIATOR SINCE IT WAS REPRESENTED TO US THAT THE SETTLEMENT MIGHT NOT BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF AN INDEPENDENT MEDIATOR. WITH THE INTERVENTION OF LEARNED COUNSEL, THE MATTER HAS NOW BEEN SETTLED. WE PLACE ON RECORD OUR APPRECIATION FOR THE ASSISTANCE RENDERED BY MR MURALIDHAR.
2. A JOINT APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 13-B OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 HAS BEEN FILED. LEARNED COUNSEL CONTEND THAT INSTEAD OF RELEGATING THE PARTIES TO VARIOUS PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THEM AND PROLONGING THEIR AGONY, THIS COURT, IN EXERCISE OF POWER UNDER ARTICLE 142 OF THE CONSTITUTION, MAY DISSOLVE THE MARRIAGE BY GRANTING DIVORCE ON MUTUAL CONSENT AND PASS OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDERS. AS PER THE SETTLEMENT PETITION, THE LAST INSTALMENT OF A SUM OF RUPEES FOUR LAKHS, OUT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT O
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.