SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1558

Y. K. SABHARWAL, P. P. NAOLEKAR
JIMMY SUDARSHAN PUROHIT – Appellant
Versus
SUDARSHAN SHARAD PUROHIT – Respondent


ORDER

1. THIS TRANSFER PETITION HAS BEEN FILED BY THE WIFE AGAINST THE RESPONDENT HUSBAND SEEKING TRANSFER OF PA NO. 334 OF 2003, ENTITLED SUDARSHAN SHARAD PUROHIT V. JIMMY SUDARSHAN PUROHIT PENDING IN THE FAMILY COURT NO.1 AT PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, TO APPROPRIATE COURT AT JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN. PRIMA FACIE, FINDING THAT THE FAMILY DISPUTE CAN BE SETTLED, WE REQUESTED MR S. MURALIDHAR, ADVOCATE, TO ASSIST THE PARTIES AS MEDIATOR SINCE IT WAS REPRESENTED TO US THAT THE SETTLEMENT MIGHT NOT BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF AN INDEPENDENT MEDIATOR. WITH THE INTERVENTION OF LEARNED COUNSEL, THE MATTER HAS NOW BEEN SETTLED. WE PLACE ON RECORD OUR APPRECIATION FOR THE ASSISTANCE RENDERED BY MR MURALIDHAR.

2. A JOINT APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 13-B OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 HAS BEEN FILED. LEARNED COUNSEL CONTEND THAT INSTEAD OF RELEGATING THE PARTIES TO VARIOUS PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THEM AND PROLONGING THEIR AGONY, THIS COURT, IN EXERCISE OF POWER UNDER ARTICLE 142 OF THE CONSTITUTION, MAY DISSOLVE THE MARRIAGE BY GRANTING DIVORCE ON MUTUAL CONSENT AND PASS OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDERS. AS PER THE SETTLEMENT PETITION, THE LAST INSTALMENT OF A SUM OF RUPEES FOUR LAKHS, OUT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT O






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top