DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
Secretary, Aruvikkara Grama Panchayat Thiruvananthapuram – Appellant
Versus
Anandakumar – Respondent
1. W.P.(C)Nos.19676/2014 and 19968/2014 are filed by Aruvikkara Grama Panchayat against Exhibit P1 common order passed by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram; W.P.(C)No.821/2015 is filed by the respondent in the other two writ petitions seeking enforcement of Exhibit P1 order. Since all the parties are common in the three writ petitions, with an identical issue to be adjudicated upon, this Court proposes to dispose of the three writ petitions through a common judgment. For ease of reference and expression, the facts as narrated and exhibits as displayed in W.P.(C)No.19676/2014 have been taken as the basis.
2. The facts in brief are that the respondent initially obtained Exhibit R1(c) building permit on 17.08.2012. Subsequently, the petitioner Grama Panchayat issued Exhibit R1(e) show cause notice to the respondent, ostensibly under Rule 18 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Building Rules, 2011, requiring him to explain why the building permit granted in Exhibit R1(c) should not be cancelled. In the face of the explanation submitted by the respondent, when the petitioner Grama Panchayat passed Exhibit R1(g) order, the respondent, aggrieved th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.