ASHOK BHUSHAN, A.M.SHAFFIQUE
K. R. VENUGOPALAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.
1. All these Writ Petitions raising similar issues have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
2. The Writ Petitions can be classified into three groups. The first group are the Writ Petitions filed for issue of a writ of quo warranto against private respondents, namely, Chairman and Members of the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission). This group consists of W.P. (C) No. 4100 of 2012, W.P. (C) No. 2190 of 2013 and W.P. (C) No. 21853 of 2014. In W.P. (C) No. 4100 of 2012 apart from challenging the appointment of Members of the Commission, petitioner has also prayed for a direction to the State Government to appoint the petitioner as a Member of the Commission.
3. In the second group there are only two Writ Petitions being W.P. (C) Nos. 19551 and 22794 of 2012. In both the Writ Petitions apart from the prayer for issuance of a writ of quo warranto, a prayer for quashing the tariff order dated 25.07.2012 issued by the Commission has also been made. The third group consists of the rest of the Writ Petitions where the petitioners have challenged the tariff order dated 25.07.2012.
4
Kannodia Chemicals and Another vs. State of U.P. and Others
Delhi Financial Corporation and Another vs. Rajiv Anand and Other
Crawford Bayley & Co. and Others vs. Union of India and Others
Rajesh Awasthi vs. Nandlal Jaiswal
Mor Modern Coop. Transport Coop. Transport Society Ltd. vs. Government of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.