The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the directions in Ext.P4 has not been complied with in Ext.P6. The petitioner was before this Court earlier seeking correction of description in the Basic Tax Register and revenue records with respect to 25.44 cents of land comprising in Survey No.55/1A of Vattamkulam Village, Edappal SRO, Malappuram District, shown as 'nilam' in the revenue records.

2. This Court relying on the decisions in Revenue Divisional Officer, Fort Kochi and others v. Jalaja Dileep and another - 2014 (1) KLT 161, Praveen K. v. Land Revenue Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram and others - 2010 (2) KHC 499 and Sunil v. Killimangalam Panjal 5th Ward, Nellulpadaka Samooham - 2012 (4) KLT 511 directed the R.D.O. to consider the application under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Unitilisation Order, 1967. However, by the time the consideration was made the decision in Revenue Divisional Officer, Fort Kochi and others v. Jalaja Dileep and another - 2014 (1) KLT 161 was reversed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in RDO v. Jalaja Dileep - 2015 (2) KHC 109 (SC).

3. The Supreme Court in RDO v. Jalaja Dileep - 2015(2) KHC 109 (SC) considered the issue of rectification of desc