SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ker) 743

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
ASMA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR, CIVIL STATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ
R1 TO R5 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE

JUDGMENT

The petitioner claims to be the owner of an extent of 2 Acres of property comprised in Survey Nos.60/1, 60/2 and 65 of Azheekode Village, Eriyad Panchayat in Thrissur District.

2. It is admitted that the property mentioned as above is included as wetland in the draft data bank prepared under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (for short, the "Act 28 of 2008").

3. The above property consists of eight manmade ponds for aquaculture and other improvements. However, in the data bank, this property is classified private pond. In the counter affidavit filed by the third respondent it is stated that in the basic tax register, the total extent of four ponds in Survey No.65 is 1 Acre and 5 cents; the extent of one pond situated in Survey No.60/2 is 15 cents; so also the extent of two ponds in Survey No.60/1 is approximately 15 cents. Therefore, the question that arises for consideration is whether the manmade ponds can be treated as a wetland for the purpose of conservation of paddy land and wetland. The wetland is defined under S.2(xviii) of the Act as follows:

"wetland" means land lying between terrestrial and aquatic systems, where the water table is usual






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top