SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 44

P.N.RAVINDRAN, K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Vineethan – Appellant
Versus
Fathima – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sri. E. Narayanan

ORDER :

K. Ramakrishnan, J.

The tenant in R.C.P.No.18 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Koyilandy is the revision petitioner herein. The original landlady filed R.C.P.No.18 of 2012 seeking eviction of the tenant from the petition schedule building on the ground of arrears of rent, bonafide need for her grandson and cessation of occupation of the building by the tenant under section 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(v) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short. During the pendency of the petition, the landlady died and supplemental petitioners 2 to 4 were impleaded as her legal heirs. It is alleged in the petition that the original landlady leased out the building to the tenant on a monthly rent of Rs.300/- as per a registered kychit dated 27.6.2003. He did not pay rent. So she filed R.C.P.No.7 of 2004 and subsequently the same was settled between the parties and arrears of rent upto 27.2.2004 was paid. Thereafter the rent was kept in arrears. He has ceased to occupy the building for more than one year without any reasonable cause. The second petitioner's son Sri.Abdul Gafoor has no job and income for his livelihood













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top