SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1161

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., K.T.SANKARAN
Jayalekshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : C. Rajendran and K.R. Ranjith.
For the Respondent: Tom Jose Padinjarekkara, Additional Director General of Prosecution.

JUDGMENT :

K.T. Sankaran, J.

1. Naveen Suresh, son of the petitioner, was detained in execution of Ext. P1 order of detention dated 21.3.2015 issued by the District Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram under Section 3(1) of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act (hereinafter referred to as 'KAAPA'), on the ground that he is a 'known rowdy' as defined in the KAAPA. The order of detention was executed on 2.4.2015. Naveen Suresh is undergoing detention. In the Writ Petition, the order of detention as well as the continued detention are under challenge. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of detention is vitiated on several grounds. We shall discuss hereunder the points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. It is stated in the order of detention that proceedings under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were initiated against the detenu in the year 2014. Even thereafter, the detenu indulged in criminal activities which resulted in the registration of Crime No. 1068 of 2014 of Kanjiramkulam Police Station and Crime No. 1511 of 2014 of Katt



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top