K.HARILAL
Jayakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Unnikrishnan – Respondent
K. Harilal, J.
1. This revision petition is filed challenging the concurrent findings of conviction entered and the sentence imposed on the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, 'the Nl Act') in Criminal Appeal No. 259/01 on the files of the Court of III Additional Sessions Judge (Ad hoc), Fast Track Court-I, Thrissur. The above appeal was filed challenging the judgment whereby the revision petitioner was found guilty of the said offence, passed in ST No. 3429/99 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Wadakkancherry. According to the impugned judgment, the revision petitioner stands sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay an amount of Rs. 38,000/- to the complainant as compensation, under Section 357(3) of the CrPC. The legality and propriety of the concurrent findings of conviction and sentence are under challenge in this revision petition. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The sole point raised by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is that the complaint was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.