SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1276

A.M.SHAFFIQUE
Vincent Panikulangara – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


ORDER :

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

'i) to strike down Exts:P-1 and P-2 declaring them as illegal and unenforceable;

ii) to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order commanding the respondents 2 and 3 to make rules for a dress code for Advocates having regard to the climatic conditions and disassociating from the British colonial hangover;

iii) a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order commanding the 1st respondent to appoint a Commission of Inquiry under Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 to enquire into and suggest appropriate dress code for Advocates;

iv) a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order commanding the respondents 1, 2 and 3 prohibit the intimidating dress code in courts, where children and illiterate rural people are likely to be involved;

v) any other relief that this honourable court deems fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case, including a direction to pay costs to the petitioner.'

2. Petitioner is a Lawyer by profession. His grievance is with reference to the Rules by which Advocates both men and women in Kerala are























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top