Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

1. Faced with successive rejections before two for a on the issue of standing, the unsuccessful petitioners have filed this revision petition.

2. The facts in brief are that the petitioners-eight in number-have claimed to be the members of the first respondent Sangam, apart from being interested persons as the beneficiaries of the Wakf maintained by the Sangham. Their grievance is that the Sangam, a registered body, is being maintained contrary to its byelaws. They allege that no elections have been held in the managing committee of the Sangam for a long time and that it has been managed by the third and fourth respondents, the self-proclaimed President and the Secretary of the Sangam, to the detriment of the Sangam. They have also made a specific allegation that vast wakf properties in the control of the Sangam are being mismanaged. In the backdrop of the above allegations, the petitioners have sought the following reliefs before the Wakf Board, Ernakulam, in O.P.No.40 of 2009.

“a. a decree directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to convene the general body of the 1st respondent committee after duly serving notice to the all general body members includ