SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 340

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Khadeeja – Appellant
Versus
Rushdi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sri. Avm Salahudin
.

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The appellants are the claimants in O.P.(MV)No. 1599 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode, an application filed under Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') claiming compensation on account of the death of one Abdul Gafoor (husband of the 1st appellant, father of 2nd and 3rd appellants and son of the 4th appellant) in a motor accident which occurred on 18.4.2013, while he was riding a motor cycle bearing No.KL-57/A-3161 along Thamarassery-Kozhikode Road. The motor cycle was owned by the 1st respondent and insured by the 2nd respondent. When the motor cycle reached the place of accident, a dog jumped in front of it. The deceased lost control of the motor cycle and it capsized, resulting serious injuries to him, who succumbed to injuries at Medical College Hospital, Kozhikode. Claiming a total compensation of 2,94,000/- from the owner and insurer of the motor cycle, claim petition was filed before the Tribunal.

2. Before the Tribunal, the 1st respondent owner was set ex parte. The 2nd respondent insurer filed written statement contending that, the policy issued








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top