K.T.SANKARAN
C. Varghese Mathai – Appellant
Versus
Varghese C. Philippukutty – Respondent
K.T. Sankaran, J.
The questions of law which arise for consideration in this Original Petition are: (1) Whether for restoration of a suit which was dismissed erroneously on the basis of a compromise entered into between the parties before the Lok Adalath, Article 122 of the Limitation Act or Article 137 of the Limitation Act would apply; and (2) When Rule 9 Order 9 of the Civil Procedure Code makes a specific provision for restoration of a suit, whether Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code can be resorted to for that purpose.
2. The petitioner is the first defendant in O.S.No.42 of 2005, Sub Court, Thiruvalla, which was filed by the first respondent for partition. An appeal between the parties as A.S.No.36 of 2004 was also pending before the Sub Court, Thiruvalla. The aforesaid matters were referred to the Lok Adalath. In the Lok Adalath held on 29.3.2008 at Sub Court, Thiruvalla, the following arrangement was arrived at:
"Parties are present, agreed to settle the matters including matters and cases pending before the Munsiff's Court, Thiruvalla after measuring the properties on or before the next Lok Adalath. The connected cases are A.S.No.35/2004, A.S.36/2004."
On the basi
M/s.Barabanki (U.P.) v. Kanhayalal Bhargava and others
Arjun Singh v. Mohindra Kumar and others
Padam Sen and another v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Krishnan Namboodiri v. Unnikrishnan Namboodiri
M/s. Ram Chand & Sons Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Kanhayalal Bhargava and others
Shipping Corporation of India Limited v. Machado Brothers and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.