P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
A. S. SHAJI – Respondent
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
Issue:
1. The Service jurisprudence, including the judicial precedents, recognizes the doctrine of abandonment: an employee voluntarily giving up his service, say, by continued absence from duty. Here an employee was found to have been continuously absent without leave-on medical grounds though. The employer disengaged him. Has the employer been justified in disengaging the employee on the grounds of abandonment of service despite the employee's defence of illness?
Introduction:
2. Here the petitioners are the employers; the respondent is an employee. When the employee absented himself for long spells from duty, albeit, under the cover of illness; the employer dispensed with his services: It disengaged the employee. Assailing the employer's action, the employee filed O.A. No. 642 of 2008 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Branch. Through Order, dt.27.08.2009, (Ext.P1) the learned Tribunal directed the employer to reinstate the employee. Amelioratively, the Tribunal permitted the employer to subject the employee to suitable medical tests to ascertain the employee's fitness to resume duty. Aggrieved by the direction of reengagement, th
Aligarh Muslim University v. Mansoor Ali Khan
Chief Engineer (Construction) v. Keshava Rao
Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd. Calcutta v. Workmen
Regional Manager, Bank of Baroda v. Anita Nandrajog
Syndicate Bank v. General Secretary, Syndicate Bank Staff Association
V.C. Banaras Hindu University v. Shrikant
Vijay S. Sathaye v. Indian Airlines Ltd. (2013) 10 SCC 253
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.