ALEXANDER THOMAS
PRASANNAKUMARI E. S. – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR, KANNUR UNIVERSITY – Respondent
The case set up in the above writ petition is as follows: The petitioner is a visually impaired person with 100% disability as certified by Ext.P-1 disability certificate dated 30.10.2009 issued by the competent Medical Board. She acquired L.L.B. Degree and had also later successfully passed the L.L.M. (Master of Laws) course and had also cleared the National Eligibility Test (NET) qualification that is prescribed by the University Grants Commission (UGC) for appointment as Lecturers/Assistant Professors in colleges and universities. Ext.P-2(a) dated 21.03.2005 is the certification awarded by the University Grants Commission after her successfully clearing the NET examination held on 20th June, 2004 in the discipline of law and it is certified therein that she has "qualified the UGC-NET examination for eligibility for Lecturership in the subject of law" and that she is a post graduate in the subject of law and that the validity of the said NET certification is forever. The 1st respondent Kannur University had issued Ext.P-3 selection notification dated 29.01.2008 inviting applications from eligible candidates for selection and appointment to the post of Lecturer/Assistant
Jeeja Ghosh v. Union of India reported in (2016) 7 SCC 761
K.Manjusree v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. reported in (2008) 3 SCC 512
Kerala Water Authority v. Surendran reported in 2006 (4) KLT 983 (FB)
Marathwada University v. Seshrao Balwant Rao Chavan reported in (1989) 3 SCC 132
Rajeev Kumar Gupta and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Ramesh Kumar v. High Court of Delhi & anr. reported in (2010) 3 SCC 104
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.