P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, P.SOMARAJAN
FRANCIS ASSISSI, S/O. THATTILMANDI JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
SR. BREESIYA MOTHER SUPERIOR, INFANT JESUS CONVENT – Respondent
P. Somarajan, J.
This Second Regular Appeal is preferred against the decree and judgment of Additional District Court, Thrissur in A.S. No. 280/1999 dated 4.12.2003 by the plaintiff in the original suit in O.S. 2295/1988 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Thrissur. The appeal had initially come up before a learned Single Judge of this Court and it was placed before us doubting the legal position laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Swami Premananda Bharathi v. Swami Yogananda Bharathi [(1985 KLT 144). Earlier, a single bench of this Court in Dr. Subramonian v. K.S.E.B. [(1987 KLT 355] expressed doubt about the legal proposition laid down in the Swami Premananda Bharathi's case but did not opt to refer the issue to a Division Bench. In Hydrose V. Govindankutty, [(1981) KLT 360] M.P. Menon. J. took the view that without setting aside the report submitted by a finger print expert, another finger print expert can be appointed. Another decision drawn in Sivaraman v. Narayanan [(1986) KLT 578] Varghese Kalliyath J. took the view that the court has jurisdiction to appoint the same Commissioner which he omitted to note in the report already submitted. So the question came
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.