SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 434

P.B.SURESH KUMAR
K. T. THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SRI. P.DEEPAK
For the Respondent: SRI. P.SANTHOSH KUMAR

JUDGMENT :

Petitioners are stage carriage operators. They operate services on an inter-regional route. Permit was obtained by the second petitioner for the service in the year 1999 and the first petitioner in the year 2000. The grants in favour of the petitioners were subject to condition that they should obtain countersignatures from the sister Regional Transport Authorities for operation of the services within their jurisdiction. The petitioners have, accordingly, obtained countersignatures on their permits from all the sister Regional Transport Authorities and were operating services on that basis. The permits granted to the petitioners were renewed on their applications later upto the year 2009 and 2010 respectively by the first respondent, the primary Regional Transport Authority, after obtaining orders of concurrence from the sister Regional Transport Authorities. Later, when the petitioners applied for renewal of the permits for the period upto the year 2014 and 2015 respectively, the first respondent again sought and obtained orders of concurrence from the sister Regional Transport Authorities. Exhibits P2 series are the orders of concurrence obtained by the first respondent


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top