P.UBAID
SURESH RAJ PUROHIT I. P. S. , S/O. LATE SRI. SHANKER LALJI PUROHIT – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
The petitioner in O.P. (Crl.) No.126 of 2016 and O.P. (Crl.) 154 of 2016 is the same person. He is a Senior I.P.S Officer in the Kerala Police Force. The petitioner in O.P. (Crl.) No. 132 of 2016 is a Sub Inspector of Police. They are the two accused arraigned in a complaint made by the 3rd respondent in O.P.(Crl.) No.126 of 2016 (one Benny), before the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge (Vigilance), Thrissur. The complaint was received by the learned trial Judge as C.M.P.325 of 2016, and it was forwarded for investigation to the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Thrissur, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Before the VACB could register a crime on the said complaint, all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the learned trial Judge were stayed by this Court as per the interim order passed in these proceedings on 11.3.2016. So, presently there is no crime against the petitioners.
2. The complainant in O.P.(Crl.) No.154 of 2016 is one P.D. Joseph. He did not contest the matter before this Court. He filed complaint before the Juvenile Justice Board, Thrissur, against the I.P.S. Officer, alleging offences under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.