SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ker) 299

V.RAMKUMAR
Biju Purushothaman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented by Its Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:M. Ajay, Advocate. For the Respondents: P.N. Sukumaran, Public Prosecutor.

Judgement Key Points

Cognizance of Offence

Cognizance is taken at the initial stage when the Magistrate peruses the complaint to ascertain if any offence is disclosed, and decides to proceed under Chapter XV Cr.P.C. by applying mind to the allegations, rather than rejecting it, ordering investigation under Sec. 156(3), or issuing search warrants (!) (!) . Cognizance is of the offence, not the offender; issuance of process follows later if prima facie case exists (!) . If the Magistrate proceeds under Chapter XV after not rejecting or forwarding under Sec. 156(3), cognizance is deemed taken (!) .

Rejection of Complaint

Rejection occurs at pre-cognizance stage if averments do not spell out any offence; this is an inherent power distinct from dismissal under Sec. 203 (!) (!) (!) . After Sec. 200 examination, if no offence made out, rejection is appropriate before Sec. 202 stage, avoiding dismissal which requires post-Sec. 202 consideration [15000197500007] (!) .

Dismissal of Complaint

Dismissal under Sec. 203 is only at post-cognizance stage, after considering sworn statements under Sec. 200 (if any), and result of Sec. 202 inquiry/investigation, if no sufficient ground for proceeding; reasons must be briefly recorded (!) (!) (!) . Cannot dismiss pre-cognizance or immediately after Sec. 200 without Sec. 202; must postpone process and conduct Sec. 202 first [15000197500007] (!) (!) . Sec. 204(4) dismissal for non-payment of process is not on merits (!) . Post-Sec. 202, if insufficient ground, dismiss under Sec. 203 (!) (!) .

Magistrate's Options on Receipt of Complaint (Summarizing Stages)

  1. Rejection: Pre-cognizance if no offence disclosed (!) .
  2. Sec. 156(3) Investigation: Pre-cognizance for cognizable offences, forwarding to police as FIR (!) .
  3. Take Cognizance (Chapter XV): If prima facie offence; then examine under Sec. 200 (exceptions apply), issue process under Sec. 204 if sufficient ground, or proceed to Sec. 202 (!) (!) (!) .
  4. Sec. 202 Inquiry/Investigation: Post-Sec. 200/200-equivalent, if postpone process; either self-inquiry or direct investigation (or both sequentially); mandatory if accused beyond jurisdiction post-2005 amendment (!) (!) (!) (!) .
  5. Post-Sec. 202 Outcomes: Issue process under Sec. 204 if sufficient ground, or dismiss under Sec. 203 if not (!) (!) .

Judgment :

The Revision Petitioner who is the 2nd accused in a private complaint filed by the 2nd respondent herein as Crl.M.P. No. 588 of 2006 before the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, (hereinafter referred to as "the Special Judge") alleging offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Sec. 120 B

I.P.C. challenges Annexure XVII order dated 25-3-2008 passed by the Special Judge ordering investigation by the Superintendent of VACB, SIU, Thiruvananthapuram, under Sec. 202 (1) Cr.P.C. after concluding an enquiry by the Special Judge himself under Section 202 (1) Cr.P.C.

2. I heard Adv. Sri. M. Ajay, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and Adv. Sri. P.

N. Sukumaran, the learned Public Prosecutor who represented the State. Eventhough the 2nd respondent/complainant (Madathil Marakkar Haji) was duly served, he has not chosen to enter appearance through counsel or oppose this Revision.

3. The allegations in the private complaint filed by the 2nd respondent herein are that in pursuance of the criminal conspiracy hatched by accused Nos. 1 to 4, accused Nos. 2, 3 and 4 who are r











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top