P.V.ASHA
SANGEETHA S. , W/O. GIRISH NADARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent
The question to be considered in this case is whether there can be any appointment in excess of the vacancies notified.
2. The Travancore Devaswom Board-1st respondent issued Ext.P1 notification dated 6.6.2013, published in various newspapers including Hindu daily inviting applications for appointment to various teaching posts. Petitioner submitted application for appointment as Assistant Professor in Botany. The number of vacancies notified in Ext.P1 in respect of the subject Botany was one. Ext.P1 notification also provided that the number of vacancies shown is likely to change.
3. On the basis of Ext.P2 call letter, the petitioner appeared for the interview. Thereafter the 1st respondent published rank list - Ext.P3 on 13.5.2015. Petitioner was ranked No.2 in the rank list. The 1st rank holder was appointed immediately after publication of Ext.P3 rank list. Petitioner submits that the 1st rank holder was appointed against the vacancy which arose on 1.04.2014 consequent to retirement of one Smt. Lekha Nair from the Devaswom Board Pumba College, Parumala. It is stated that one Sri. Anilkumar who was also working in the very same College retired on 31.5.2015; on 2.3.2016 on
Sunil Kumar Vs. Cochin Devaswom Board
Kerala Agricultural University v. Gopinathan Unnithan
State of Orissa and another v. Rajkishore Nanda and others
Suresh R.(Dr.) v. Mahatma Gandhi University and others
State of Bihar and others v. The Secretariat Assistant S.E. Union and others
Prem Singh and others v. Haryana State Electricity Board and others
Banking Service Recruitment Board and others
Surinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.