A.M.SHAFFIQUE, K.RAMAKRISHNAN
ANITHA KESAVADAS – Appellant
Versus
K. BABUKUTTAN PILLAI – Respondent
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
1. Since these appeals arise out of separate original petitions decided by the Family Court by a common judgment dated 07.02.2015, they are heard and decided together.
2. M.A. No. 311/2015 has been filed by the petitioner in O.P. No. 1521/2011 and the respondent's appeal is M.A. No. 403/2015. M.A. Nos. 562/2015 and 575/2015 have been filed by the petitioner in O.P. No. 508/2011 and the petitioners in O.P. No. 662/2011. M.A. No. 404/2015 has been filed by the respondents in O.P. No. 600/2010 by which the Family Court had directed that the appellant should be prosecuted under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC.
3. Brief outline of the factual circumstances involved in the matrimonial dispute which has arisen in the facts of the case can be narrated as under:
(i) The petitioner/wife and the 1st respondent in O.P. No. 600/2010 are the parties to the marriage which was solemnized, as per Hindu religious rites and custom on 05.11.1989. Marriage was dissolved as per judgment dated 28.2.2011 in O.P. No. 471/2010 of the Family Court, Ernakulam. They have two children and both have become majors presently. After the marriage, petitioner and 1st respondent were living at the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.