P.V.ASHA
V. G. ANUPAMA MUNSIFF, MANJERI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT – Respondent
Both these writ petitions are filed by the very same petitioner. In W.P.(C) No. 9440 of 2012, petitioner challenges the condition imposed in Ext.P6 order while granting her Leave Without Allowance (LWA) for study purposes, that she had to rejoin duty as a new entrant on expiry of the leave. In W.P.(C) No. 13556 of 2014, petitioner challenges the action of the High Court in rejecting her representation without forwarding it to Government, in which she had requested for converting her application for leave as one under Rule 91. The documents referred to are as described in W.P.(C) No. 9440 of 2012 unless specified otherwise.
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Munsiff-Magistrate in Kerala Judicial Service as per Ext.P2 order dated 25.7.2008. After undergoing training for a period of one year from 18.8.2008, she took charge as Munsiff on 21.05.2009. On 30.8.2010, she submitted application for LWA for one year from 13.09.2010, for study purposes in order to undergo Ph.D at National Law School of University. By Ext.P4 order dated 4.11.2010 Government accorded sanction for the same from date of avail after that order subject to conditions laid down in Appendix XIIB, Part I KSR.
Baleswar Dass and others vs. State of UP and others
Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers’ Association vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Life Insurance Corporation of India and another vs. Raghavendra Seshagiri Rao Kulkarni
O.P. Singla and another vs. Union of India and others
R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab
Ramesh K.Sharma and another vs. Rajasthan Civil Services and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.