C.K.ABDUL REHIM, A.HARIPRASAD, SHIRCY V.
Babu – Appellant
Versus
Kunjumol Nandiyanathayil – Respondent
A. Hariprasad, J.
Following legal conundrums crop up for adjudication in this appeal :
"Whether an appeal could be maintained under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 (in short, the Act) against an order passed by a Single Judge under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, Cr.P.C.) either allowing or refusing to transfer a case or appeal from one criminal court to another criminal court in the same Sessions division? Parenthetically, does the High Court exercise original jurisdiction while dealing with a case under Section 407 Cr.P.C. also arises for consideration."
2. This matter comes up before us on a reference by a Division Bench. The Division Bench was of the view that some observations in Balan v. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust 2005 (4) KLT 865] rendered by a Full Bench run contrary to the law laid down by a Division Bench in S. Narayanaswami v. Padma [1972 KLT 7] touching on the issue.
3. Short facts relevant for disposal of the case can be summarized thus: Appellant is the 4th accused in a Sessions case. The appellant, along with other accused, stood charge-sheeted for grave offences, including murder. Victim's mother
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.