P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, ANIL K.NARENDRAN
SREEJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA – Respondent
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
1. The interesting question involved is whether an appeal is maintainable in terms of Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, against an order of a single Judge, dismissing the petition filed under Section 407 of the Cr.P.C. seeking for transfer of a criminal case pending before a Magistrate's Court to another Magistrate's court in a different district. It is contended as maintainable with reference to the law declared by a Full Bench of this Court reported in 2005 (4) KLT 865 (Balan vs. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust) holding that, appeal is maintainable in respect of an order passed by a Single Judge in exercise of the powers under Section 24 of the CPC (similar power for transfer), which principle is sought to be applied in the given case as well.
2. The basic facts required for effective adjudication of this case are that, the appellants were proceeded against by the police, registering as many as 27 crimes in different police stations in the five northern districts of Kerala–namely Kasaragodu, Kannur, Wynad, Kozhikode and Malappuram, involving the offence of theft under Section 379 IPC read with Section 34 therein. The case of
Balan vs. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust
Narayana Reddiar v. Rugmini Ammal
Sreedhara v. Jawala Prasad Gupta and Others
A.R. Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak and Another
Bengal Immunity Co. vs. State of Bihar
Amitava Das Gupta vs. Nath Bank Ltd. AIR 1971 SC 218
Abubacker Kunju vs. Thulasidas
Sreedhara vs. Jawala Prasad Gupta and Others
Vysali Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. S.G.S. Mediom (P) Ltd. 2001 (1) KLT 317
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.