SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 933

ALEXANDER THOMAS
Johnson, Kottayam District – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Alex. M. Scaria, Saritha Thomas
For the Respondents: Saigi Jacob Peletty

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner is accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in S.T.No.86 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court- II, Vaikom, instituted on the basis of a complaint preferred by the second respondent herein.

2. The trial court, as per the impugned judgment rendered on 28.9.2015, had convicted the petitioner for the abovesaid offence and had sentenced him to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay fine of Rs.1,36,782/- to the complainant under Section 357(1) (b) of the Cr.P.C. and in default of payment of fine, the accused was ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

3. Aggrieved thereby the petitioner had preferred Crl.Appeal No.156 of 2015 on the file of the Sessions Court, Kottayam. The appellate court concerned (Court of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, (Special) Kottayam), as per the impugned judgment rendered on 27.4.2017, had confirmed the conviction and modified the sentence to imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay fine of Rs.91,188/- to the complainant and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The fine amount, if










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top