P.UBAID
Manoj Abraham IPS – Appellant
Versus
P. P. Chandrasekharan Nair – Respondent
1. The petitioner herein is a Senior Police Officer of IPS rank in Kerala. The first respondent herein brought a complaint against the police officer before the Special Court (Vigilance), Muvattupuzha, containing so many allegations, including amassment of wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income as a police officer, while working as Commissioner of Police at Ernakulam. On the said complaint, the court below directed a Quick Verification (preliminary enquiry). After a detailed enquiry into the various aspects of the matter including the meticulous details of the income and expenditure of the petitioner, the Deputy Superintendent of Police of the Ernakulam Special Cell of the Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau (VACB) submitted a report before the Court on 21.05.2015. The report of the VACB is that the acquisition of disproportionate assets made by the petitioner is only a negligible 0.25%, and the VACB reported that there is no scope for a prosecution under Section 13(1) (e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act). Notice of this report was given to the complainant. The report of enquiry was seriously objected by the compl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.