B.KEMAL PASHA
State of Kerala Rep. by the District Collector – Appellant
Versus
V. V. George – Respondent
1.........
(i) Is the State absolved from the liability to compensate persons whose properties are lost, in the attack by wild animals coming out from the forest?
(ii) Is not the doctrine of strict liability applicable to cases wherein properties have been lost to persons in the attack of wild animals?
2. The respondent herein as plaintiff had approached the Munsiff's Court, Ranni through O.S. No. 187 of 2003 seeking damages of Rs. 90,000/- on account of loss sustained to his properties in the attack of wild animals. The property of the plaintiff is abutting the reserve forest. In the absence of any fencing to the forest, wild animals like wild elephants, deer etc. used to come out from the forest to have frequent visits to the property of the plaintiff, mostly in odd hours. The plaintiff had planted the property with high yielding species of rubber trees and also arecanuts. All the arecanut trees except one were broken/uprooted by the elephants. 40 rubber trees were severely attacked by the elephants and deer and its entire bark were removed thereby making it impossible for the plaintiff to tap the said rubber trees for extracting latex. He had caused to issue a demand noti
Dhulabhai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Another
Jay Laxmi Salt Works (P) Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat
Raman vs. Cochin Devaswom Board
State of Punjab vs. M/s. Modern Cultivators
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others vs. Smt. Halli Devi
Varghese vs. Kerala State Electricity Board
Vohra Sadikbhai Rajakbhai and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.