K.VINOD CHANDRAN
Raju Augustine – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Forest Officer, Mankulam, Idukki District – Respondent
1. The petitioners are aggrieved with the refusal to release vehicle bearing Registration No.KL-40A-7027 and the timber transported, pursuant to which detention & seizure, O.R. No.4 of 2017 of Forest Range Office, Mankulam was registered. The vehicle and the timber were seized on 20.03.2017 as is evidenced from Ext.P5 Mahazar. Ext.P5 indicates that when the vehicle was sought to be detained, the driver stopped the vehicle and ran out, who could not be apprehended, even though chased. The Forest Officials on further inspection of the vehicle found that it contained timber logs, which transport was not supported by any documents. Hence a crime was registered as O.R. No.4 of 2017 and the vehicles were seized.
2. The vehicle belongs to the 2nd petitioner and the logs were cut from the property of the 1st petitioner, which did not require any sanction from the Forest authorities, contend petitioners. It is also submitted that Ext.P3 Certificate issued by the Village Officer on the very next day specifically indicates that the logs were cut from the property of the petitioner, wherein the stumps were detected as seen from the Certificate issued by the Village Officer.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.