R. Narayana Pisharadi, J.

1. This appeal is filed by the petitioner in O.P.No.283 of 2011 on the file of the Family Court, Palakkad.

2. The respondent in the appeal is the father of the appellant. He is the respondent in O.P.No.283 of 2011 filed in the Family Court. The parties shall be hereinafter referred to as the petitioner and the respondent.

3. The petitioner filed O.P. No. 283 of 2011 in the Family Court claiming an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- from the respondent to meet the expenses of her marriage. The respondent filed counter statement denying marital relationship with the mother of the petitioner. He also denied the paternity of the petitioner and also his liability to meet the expenses of her marriage.

4. During the proceedings before the court below, the petitioner and her mother were examined as PW1 and PW2 and Exts.A1 to A28 documents were marked on the side of the petitioner. The respondent was examined as RW1. On appreciating the evidence adduced by the parties, the Family Court found that the appellant who is receiving rent from two buildings owned by her has got sufficient income to meet the expenses of her marriage and therefore dismissed the petition.

5. We ha