Abdul Rehim, J.

All the above connected Review Petitions arose out of two common judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court, in Writ Appeal No. 1019 of 2012 and connected cases and in Writ Appeal No. 767 of 2012 and connected cases, dated 27-06-2012 and 13-07-2012, respectively. The Employees Provident Fund Organization, who is respondent in all the Writ Appeals is seeking review of the judgments to the extent it permitted the employees of the District Co-operative Banks and the State Co-operative Banks to exercise options for transferring their membership from the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 and from the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995; and also to the extent of the direction issued to the EPF Commissioner to transfer the funds on the basis of such applications. The Review Petitions are filed mainly pointing out that the provisions contained in the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 does not provide any right of option to the individual employees and the exemptions/exclusions provided under the EPF Act or under the Pension Scheme enables only an establishment to opt for any other Scheme. It is contended that, while rendering the judgments sought to be reviewed