T.B.RADHAKRISHNAN, BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
SANTHARAM P. – Appellant
Versus
K. RAVEENDRAN – Respondent
T.B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
1. This appeal is by the claimant challenging the quantum of compensation awarded to him by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The claimant, a practising advocate, who deposed that he was then earning around Rs. 6,000/- per month, was injured as a result of a motor accident when a tempo trax driven by the first respondent knocked down the motorcycle on which the claimant was riding through a public road on 08/09/2001. The claimant testified as PW1 and tendered documentary evidence as Exts. A1 to A22. Ext. X1 certificate of disability issued by the Medical Board, Medical College Hospital, evidenced that the claimant's permanent disability is 27%. No contra evidence was tendered by either among the respondents. The Tribunal held that the first respondent was negligent. It did not find any contributory negligence on the claimant. The claimant was awarded a total amount of Rs. 3,70,416/- as compensation with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition till payment.
2. When this appeal came up for consideration for admission on 10/01/2008, it was minuted as follows:
"Admit only regarding the question of reimbursement of medical bills. Issue not
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pathumma
Secy. of State v. Rama Rao AIR 1916 PC 21
R.M.A.R.A. Adaikapao Chettiar and Another v. R. Chandrasekhara Thevar
N.S. Thread Co. v. James Chadwick and Brothers
Collector, Varanasi v. Gauri Shanker
South Asia Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Sarup Singh
Vattipalle Eswariah v. Vattipalle Rameswarayya
Kasi Viswanathan Chettiar v. Chinnaiah Chettiar 1977 (II) MLJ 524
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.