K. Harilal, J.

The revision petitioner is the complainant and the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crl.M.P. No. 3797/2008 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Ottapalam. The 2nd respondent is a public servant working as the Sub Inspector of Police. The above complaint was filed alleging the offences punishable under Sections 384 and 389 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The revision petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 368/08 of Shornur Police Station. The above crime was registered on the basis of a complaint filed by the 3rd respondent herein alleging the offence punishable under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. He is the complainant in another Crime No. 459/2008 registered against the 3rd respondent herein. In connection with that case, on 21.9.2008 at 9.00 a.m., when the revision petitioner went to the police station, the 2nd respondent had arrested him in Crime No. 368/08, which was registered against him on the complaint of the 3rd respondent. After the arrest, he was not produced before the court on that day. When his relatives questioned, the 2nd respondent said that there was 24 hours time to produce the revision peti