SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ker) 922

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Ruby Soney – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Roy Chacko, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Spl. Government Pleader, P.K.Soyuz.

JUDGMENT

P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J.

Ext. P6 order passed by the 3rd respondent declining the relief sought for, as per Ext. P4 and relegating the petitioner to approach the Local Level Monitoring Committee for getting necessary relief is subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.

2. The case of the petitioner is that she is the owner of the land having an extent of 31.20 Ares of land situated in Re. Sy No. 512/15 of Athirampuzha village and that the said land is never a 'paddy land' as defined under Section 2 (xii) or 'wet land' as defined under Section 2 (xviii) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy land and Wetland Act 2008 (Act 28 of 2008), but is a 'reclaimed land' and that lot of improvements have been made therein including age old trees and such other items. The property has been shown in the Data Bank Register, as a converted land, as borne by Ext. P3, having reclaimed as early as in 2000. Ext. P2 is the certificate issued by the Agricultural Officer as early as on 08.09.2009, as to the physical nature of the property. The petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P(C) No. 29636 of 2012, seeking for a direction to the concerned respondent, to consider the application





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top