SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 970

P.N.RAVINDRAN, A.M.BABU
Shamsudeen – Appellant
Versus
Shreeram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri. C.A. Anoop, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri. Philip. T. Varghese (B/o)

JUDGMENT :

A.M. Babu, J.

A loan of Rs. 4,68,000/- was availed of by the appellant and the second respondent from the first respondent. The loan was availed of for the purchase of a vehicle. The vehicle purchased was hypothecated to the first respondent. The loan was to be repaid in instalments. The instalments were defaulted. This led to the repossession of the vehicle by the first respondent. It sold the vehicle for Rs.2,01,000/-. The balance was stated to be Rs.2,25,000/-. There was an arbitration clause in the hypothecation agreement. The arbitrator awarded Rs.3,22,730/- as the amount to be paid to the first respondent by the appellant and the second respondent. It appears that the appellant and the second respondent did not appear before the arbitrator.

2. O.P.(Arb.)No.25 of 2016 was filed before the District Court, Manjeri under section 34(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the Act" for short). It was filed by the appellant to get the arbitration award set aside. The learned District Judge heard the maintainability of the application and dismissed it as not maintainable. It was found that there was a breach of section 34(5) of the Act.

3. We heard the learned couns






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top