SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 774

High Court of Kerala
K. Padmanabhan Nair, V. Ramkumar, JJ.
Pradeepan - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
W.A. No. 1599 of 2003
Decided On : 27-05-2005

Headnote:

Criminal Law - Criminal Trial - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Evidence Act , 1872 - Section 9 - Offence of Murder - Appellants were found guilty of the offences punishable under - Post-mortem - Question arising for consideration is how far the contents of certificate can be relied on - seven named accused persons and four other persons who can be identified by sight and owing allegiance to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) hatched a conspiracy to commit murder of deceased because of their political enmity towards him - Deceased was the State Vice President of the Bharatheeya Yuva Morcha and was working as a teacher in School - In pursuance of a common object of committing murder of deceased the appellants and other accused formed themselves into members of an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons like iron rod, swords, large chopping knife, axe etc. and committed rioting - They trespassed into the property wherein.School is situated - Accused 2, 3 and 6 came to the eastern side of the building in which deceased was taking class - Challenging acquittal of the 5th accused Investigating Officer who was examined as P.W.30 in the case has filed Crl.M.C.No.5125 of 2003 for expunging the adverse remarks made against him and also to vacate the direction issued by the learned Sessions Judge to the Government to take action against him appellants were found guilty of the offence under - Held, School Master was brutally murdered inside the class in front of his students while he was teaching incident happened in broad daylight accused had not made any attempt to conceal their identity committing the murder of Jayakrishnan Master wrote a warning on the blackboard that if anybody dares to give evidence, Jayakrishnan will be repeated the place in procession through a public road brandishing the blood stained weapons like swords, etc.as if they were celebrating a victory sin committed by the deceased was that he believed in an ideology which the Communist Party of India (Marxist) to accused are followers, could not tolerate - Retributive spirit with which the cult of violence is practised in that area deserves to be condemned and deprecated in the strongest language - Bodily assaults and homicides can never be the solution to the differences in political ideologies - They only serve to produce maimed fellowmen, orphaned children and hapless widows. It was certainly not for this sorry state of affairs that our great ancestors fought for - Capital sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge in this case under section 302 I.P.C. is justified and does not call for any interference - Court not find any reason to interfere with the sentences imposed - Therefore confirm the sentences imposed on those counts also - But, t Sessions Judge made a minor mistake in ordering that the sentences shall run consecutively - It is well settled position of law that if imprisonment for life is awarded on one count, other sentences can run only concurrently - So, direction that sentences shall run consecutively is set aside - The sentences shall run concurrently - It goes without saying that on the execution of the capital sentence the other sentences will lapse - Crl.A.No.1685 of 2003 filed by accused are dismissed -Crl.M.C.No.5125 of 2003 filed by P.W.30 is allowed.

 JUDGMENT

Padmanabhan Nair, J.

1. Accused Nos.1 and 4 in S.C. No. 146/01 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court (Adhoc-II, Fast Track), Thalassery, are the appellants in Crl. Appeal No. 1599 of 2003. Accused Nos. 2,3 and 6 in the above said case are the appellants in Crl.A.1685 of 2003. Crl. Appeal No. 800 of 2004 is filed by the sate challenging the acquittal of the 5th accused in the said case. The mother of the deceased (K.T. Jayakrishnan Master) has filed Crl.R.P.No. 573 of 2004 challenging the acquittal of the 5th accused. The Investigating Officer who was examined as P.W.30 in the case has filed Crl.M.C.No.5125 of 2003 for expunging the adverse remarks made against him and also to vacate the direction issued by the learned Sessions Judge to the Government to take action against him. Since all the appellants were found guilty of the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence to death, the learned Sessions Judge referred the case for confirmation under section 366 of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the same was numbered as D.S.R.1 of 2004. The Death Sentence Reference was also heard along with the Criminal Appeals and Criminal Revision Petition. The appellants were found guilty of the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 342, 449, 302 read with 149 of I.P.C. They were convicted and sentenced to death for the offence punishable under section 302, imprisonment for life for the offence under section 449, rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under section 342, rigorous imprisonment for 6 months for the offence under section 143 and rigorous imprisonment for 3 years for the offence under section 148 of Indian Penal Code. No separate sentence was awarded for the offence punishable under section 147 of I.P.C. The sentences were directed to run consecutively.

2. The Prosecution case in brief is as follows:-

The seven named accused persons and four other persons who can be identified by sight and owing allegiance to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) hatched a conspiracy to commit murder of late K.T. Jayakrishnan Master because of their political enmity towards him. The deceased Jayakrishnan Master was the State Vice President of the Bharatheeya Yuva Morcha and was working as a teacher in Mokeri East U.P. School, at paremmel in Mokeri Amsom and Desom of Kannur District. In pursuance of a common object of committing the murder of Jayakrishanan Master, the appellants and other accused formed themselves into members of an unlawful assembly at 10.40 a.m. on 1-12-1999 armed with deadly weapons like iron rod, sword, large chopping knife, axe etc, and committed rioting. They trespassed into the property wherein Mokeri East U.P School is situated. Accused 2,3, and 6 came to the eastern side of the building in which Jayakrishnan Master was taking class. Accused Nos. 1, 4, and 7 came to the western side of that building. Accused Nos. 1, 4, and 7 criminally trespassed into the class room from the western side of the building and wrongfully confined Jayakrishnan Master who was teaching the students in Standard VI B. thereafter, in the presence of the students the first accused beat on the head of the deceased with an iron rod. The other accused persons started inflicting injuries. Jayakrishnan Master made a futile attempt to escape from the class. At the time of initial attack he was standing on the western side of the class room. He ran towards the eastern side of the class room and reached the south eastern corner of the class. At that time, accused No. 2, 3, and 6, the other members of the unlawful assembly who were waiting on the eastern property jumped over the half wall and trespassed into the class room. They joined A1, A4 and A7 in attacking Jayakrishnan and indiscriminately inflicted injuries on the body of Jayakrishnan Master using weapons like swords, chopping knife etc.
























































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top