C. Kuriakose, J.

1. It appears to me that there is an element of genuineness in the grievance, which is voiced by the petitioner who is approaching this court in respect of the same subject matter, i.e., shop No.13/1, for the third time. In that shop room the petitioner's uncle and after him the petitioner used to conduct a fruit stall. The respondents are the Paravur Municipality and its Council. The conduct of the fruit stall in question was entrusted to the petitioner by his uncle who is hospitalised at the Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum for treatment for terminal condition of cancer. While the petitioner was conducting the fruit stall, the 1st respondent-Municipality issued a demolition notice to him, his uncle as well as to the owner of the shop room alleging that renovations had been effected without permission from the Municipality. Challenging that demolition notice the petitioner approached the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions and the Tribunal passed Ext.P2 order dated 8.2.2007 staying the demolition notice. The petitioner submits that even as Ext.P2 order was in currency, the petitioner was served with Ext.P3 notice dated 31.1.2007 directing the