SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ker) 262

S.K.KADER
Asst Collector Of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Wilfred Sebastian – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.K. Kader, J.

1. The important question that arises for determination in this criminal appeal, filed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, is whether the illegality of a search conducted under S.105 of the Customs Act, 52 of 1962, hereinafter referred to as the Act, will vitiate the seizure of the articles and the consequent trial of the case.

2. On a complaint filed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise of the Integrated Divisional Office, Trivandrum, ten accused, including the respondents herein-who are respectively accuses Nos. 1, 2 to 4 and 9, were tried by the Additional Judicial Magistrate of the Fist Class, Trivandrum, for an offence punishable under S.135 of the Act, on the allegation that they acquired possession of the following articles of foreign origin, viz., (1) Cabin--All 8' Cinema Projector. 81. No. 128323 (Made in Japan; (2) Car Cassette stereo player kasuga Model K.C. 9316 (Made in Japan; (3) Cassette car stereo with AM. Radio Model No. NR. 201A SI. No. 0397 2. F. Made in Japan; and (4) Two motor cycles Suzuki Made in Japan, with the knowledge that these articles are liable for confiscation under S.111 of the Act. It was in the course of a se













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top