SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 103

H.R.KHANNA, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Shyam Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Judgment

P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J.: The appellants along with another accused Narayan Singh, were convicted by the High Court under sections 332, 353, 342 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to one year s rigorous imprisonment on each count,the sentences to run concurrently. These two appeals are by special leave.

2. On 26-5-1965, Sardar Jagat Singh, owner of a lorry made an application to the Vigilance Commissioner, Bhopal Division that the appellant in Crl. Appeal No. 80/69 Shyam Lal Sharma, Barrier Inspector at village Multai, District Betul, has seized the licence of his Driver stating that if he has to pass from the Barrier, he should bring Rs.5/- per trip or Rs.40/- p.m. but the Driver refused to pay him anything and has declined to go there as a result of which he is likely to suffer heavy loss. He, therefore, offered to give currency notes which may be signed and requested that a proper person may be given to him to arrest the Barrier Inspector Sharma and his staff and save him from the corruption. On this application, Circle Inspector Rana Ranjit Singh, P.W.1 was asked to attend to it. Accodingly, he along with Jagat Singh, his Driver and Panchas Hardeet Singh, P.W.6 a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top