SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 590

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, D.SREEDEVI
Badarudeen – Appellant
Versus
KSRTC – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. P. B. Suresh Kumar for the appellant and Mr. V. Bhaskara Menon for the respondents.

2. The above appeal is directed against the Judgment of the learned Single Judge in O. P. 10422 of 1997 dated 27th February 1997 dismissing the Original Petition filed by the appellant herein for a mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the death cum retirement benefit due to the appellant, with interest at 18 per cent per annum.

3. The appellant was a driver in the service of the first respondent Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation'). He retired from service on 31st May 1994. According to the appellant, even after three years of his retirement, he was not disbursed his death cum retirement gratuity and that the same was withheld by the respondent for the reason that the Corporation sustained some loss in connection with a motor accident involving a vehicle owned by the Corporation and driven by the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that no liability, whatsoever, has been fixed by the Corporation against the appellant either before or after his retirement, and that he was never charge sheeted by the Corp


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top