SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Ker) 313

V.KHALID
Beeyems Construction Co. – Appellant
Versus
Govt Of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V. Khalid, J.

1. The petitioner is a construction company represented by its partner. He is engaged in the business of undertaking civil contract works for which purpose workers are engaged from time to time at the site. The petitioner has an office at Thoppumpadi, Cochin-5, in order to coordinate the work and supervise the same.

2. The 1st respondent is the Government of Kerala and the 2nd respondent, the Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation, Trichur. In exercise of the powers conferred on the 1st respondent by S.1 (5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, for short the Act, notice was issued of its intention to extend the provisions of the Act to certain classes of establishments specified in the schedule annexed to the notification. A true copy of the notification is Ext. P1. S.1(5) reads as follows:

"1(5) The appropriate Government may, in consultation with the Corporation and (where the appropriate Government is a State Government, with the approval of the Central Government), after giving six months' notice of its intention of so doing by notification in the Official Gazette, extend the provisions of this Act or any of them, to any other establishment or class of esta














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top