SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 439

High Court of Kerala
K. Sreedharan, L. Manoharan, JJ.
Ignatious Jolly & Ors - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.A. No. 123 of 1989
Decided On : 24-11-1992

The judgment establishes the principle that the evidence of a single witness can be accepted if worthy of belief and corroborated by other circumstances.

Headnote:

S.341, 506 (ii) and 302 read with S.34 IPC - The court found accused 1 to 3 guilty of the offence punishable under S.302 read with S.34 IPC and sentenced each to undergo imprisonment for life under the said Section.

Fact of the Case:

Accused 1 to 3, along with the 4th accused, were charged under S.341, 506 (ii) and 302 read with S.34 IPC for causing the death of Jose Thomas. The prosecution presented evidence of the accused's enmity towards the deceased and their common intention to cause his death.

Finding of the Court:

The court found accused 1 to 3 guilty of the offence punishable under S.302 read with S.34 IPC and sentenced each to undergo imprisonment for life under the said Section. The fourth accused was acquitted.

Issues: The court analyzed the credibility of the occurrence witness, PW 6, and the corroboration of his evidence with other circumstances, including the recovery of weapons, the treatment of the second accused for injuries sustained, the conduct of the accused by absconding, and the evidence as regards motive.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the evidence of a single witness can be accepted if worthy of belief and corroborated by other circumstances. The court also highlighted the importance of a realistic approach to witness testimony, considering the shock and fear experienced during a violent occurrence.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the conviction and sentences of accused 1 to 3.

JUDGMENT

L. Manoharan, J.

1. Accused 1 to 3 in Sessions Case No. 65 of 1987 of the First Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam are the appellants. Accused 1 to 3 along with the 4th accused one Salim ware charged under S.341, 506 (ii) and 302 read with S.34 I.P.C. Learned First Additional Sessions Judge found accused 1 to 3 guilty of the offence punishable under S.302 read with S.34 IPC and sentenced each to undergo imprisonment for life under the said Section. Fourth accused was acquitted. Accused 1 to 3 challenge the conviction and sentence in this appeal.

2. Prosecution case can be summarised as follows :-

On account of the enmity the accused persons had against Jose Thomas (deceased), son of PW 10, in furtherance of their common intention to cause the death of Jose Thomas, first accused armed with MO 6 chopper. and accused 2 and 3 armed with MOs. 7 chopper and 8 knife assembled on 29-8-1986 at about 7.30 P. M. on the rear side of the house situated near the fire station at Aluva Ma which accused 1 and 2 were residing. While, they were so waiting, on seeing Jose Thomas (deceased) riding on the pillion of a scooter ridden by PW 1, proceeding from east to west, the 3rd accused made a hiz-hiz sound to the deceased to stop whereupon Jose Thomas asked PW 1 to stop the scooter. The scooter was stopped and Jose Thomas came towards the place where the 3rd accused was standing in the company of the 4th accused. PW 1 remained where the scooter was stopped. Accused 1 and 2 approached PW 1 and criminally intimidated him saying that he would be done away with if he remained there and asked him to go away, PW.1 moved away to some distance. Then accused 1 and 2 also closed in where Jose Thomas was standing, When first accused armed with MO. 6 chopper, second accused armed with MO-7 chopper and third accused armed with MO-8 knife came closer, the scared Jose Thomas pleaded not to kill him. Accused 1 to 4 restrained Jose Thomas from escaping ; first accused cut him with MO. 6 chopper on his right hand, second accused cut him with MO-7 chopper on his left hand and third accused inflicted a stab on his chest with MO-8 knife. Again first accused inflicted several cut injuries on Jose Thomas, one of which fell on the left side of his (Jose Thomas) neck. On receiving the injuries he fell down. Thereafter, accused 1 and 2 Inflicted several cut injuries on different parts of the body of Jose Thomas, and third accused again stabbed him on his chest. Finally, first accused dealt a violent blow with MO-6 chopper on his neck which almost decapitated Jose Thomas. Accused 1 and 3 escaped on a scooter and accused 2 and 4 escaped on a motor cycle.

3. PW-36, Additional Sub Inspector of Police attached to the Police Station, Aluva, on receiving information over phone proceeded to the scene of occurrence. He saw the injured lying on the road with bleeding injuries. He took him to the Government Hospital, Aluva where he was pronounced dead, PW 36 made enquiries in the hospital whether any person had seen the occurrence; on learning that PW 1 saw the occurrence took him Jo the police station. He recorded Ext. P1(a) First information statement at 9.15 P.M. on 29-8-1986 and registered crime 362 of 1986 for which fee prepared Ext. P1 (b) F. I. R. against accused 1 to 3 and another person who could be identified on sight.

4. PW-45 took over the investigation in the same night. He deputed PW 36 on the next day for preparing inquest. He (PW-36) held inquest and prepared Ext. P18 inquest report PW 42 held autopsy; Ext. P45 is the post mortem report. PW 44 proceeded to the scene and prepared Ext. P19 scene mahazar. He seized the material objects found at the scene. As per his instruction PW 37 conducted search in the houses of the accused persons. Exts. P32 to 41 are copies of search memo and search list. PW 41, Sub Inspector of Police, Binanipuram seized the shirt of the second accused (MO-14) produced by PW 16 under Ext. P15. He also seized MO-16 shirt of the first accused









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top