SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 602

ARIJIT PASAYAT, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Kumaran – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, C.J.

1. In this appeal under S.5 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 ( in short the 'Act') challenge is to the order passed by the learned single Judge, vacating the interim order of stay passed earlier.

2. Brief reference of factual position would suffice. Appellant was convicted by the Special Judge, Trichur in C.C.No. 9 of 1998 in respect of offences relatable to S.7 and 13 (2), read with S.13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the 'P.C. Act') In Crl.A.No. 551 of 1991, an application, (Crl.M.P.No. 3387,) was filed for stay of operation of the judgment and the order convicting the accused. By order dated 13.9.1999, the learned single Judge passed the following order:

"In the light of the submission that the petitioner faces a dismissal order, there will be a stay of operation of the judgment of the trial court and the order convicting the accused also will stand suspended for a period of six months."

An interim order passed in the Original Petition No. 20706 of 1999 on 12.8.1999, was subsequently vacated on 14.10.1999.

3. According to learned counsel for the appellant, since there has been stay of operation of the judgement of the trial




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top