C. S. Rajan, J.

1. The petitioner was appointed by the first respondent as Hindi teacher in his school. She continued in the above school till 14.7.1986. The above appointment was approved by the second respondent. The petitioner's services were terminated for want of vacancy due to division fall, An Additional post of Junior Hindi Teacher was sanctioned with effect from 15.7.87 by the second respondent for the academic year 1987-88. According to the petitioner she was fully qualified to be appointed to the above post. She was also entitled to get preferential treatment under R.51A of Chapter XIV-A K.E.R. But the first respondent did not issue any appointment order to the petitioner. Instead of that, the first respondent appointed on K.P. Lilly. The petitioner filed Ext. P6 representation before the first respondent requesting to appoint her in the above vacancy. The petitioner also filed a representation before the second respondent. The second respondent, after considering the above representation, refused to approve the appointment of Smt. K.P.Lilly, Accordingly here services were terminated. Still the first respondent did not appoint the petitioner in the above vacancy.