K.HEMA
Chenthamara – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
K. Hema, J.
1. Is actual entry of penis through vagina essential, to constitute "rape" under section 375 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short)? In the absence of penile-vaginal entry, will the offence of "rape" be made out, under Section 375 IPC? What does the expression "penetration" in Explanation to section 375 IPC mean? These are the main questions which arise for consideration in this revision.
2. Facts briefly: A girl aged 12 years is the alleged victim in this case. The accused is her neighbour. On the crucial day, she went to his house, as usual, to play chess. She played chess with accused's brother and also the accused. Thereafter, the accused asked the girl to keep the chess board back in the room. When she went to the room with the chess board, accused accompanied her and, on reaching the room, he closed her mouth, took her to a corner of the room and committed rape on PW1. The accused let the child go, on seeing blood trickling down her leg.
3. The accused was charge sheeted for offence under Section 376 IPC. After trial, learned Assistant Sessions Judge found the accused to be guilty of attempt to commit rape and convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.