SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 742

K.HEMA
Chenthamara – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


ORDER

K. Hema, J.

1. Is actual entry of penis through vagina essential, to constitute "rape" under section 375 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short)? In the absence of penile-vaginal entry, will the offence of "rape" be made out, under Section 375 IPC? What does the expression "penetration" in Explanation to section 375 IPC mean? These are the main questions which arise for consideration in this revision.

2. Facts briefly: A girl aged 12 years is the alleged victim in this case. The accused is her neighbour. On the crucial day, she went to his house, as usual, to play chess. She played chess with accused's brother and also the accused. Thereafter, the accused asked the girl to keep the chess board back in the room. When she went to the room with the chess board, accused accompanied her and, on reaching the room, he closed her mouth, took her to a corner of the room and committed rape on PW1. The accused let the child go, on seeing blood trickling down her leg.

3. The accused was charge sheeted for offence under Section 376 IPC. After trial, learned Assistant Sessions Judge found the accused to be guilty of attempt to commit rape and convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top